WHY GREEN SUBSIDIES ARE PREFERRED TO CARBON TAXES Climate policy with heightened carbon tax salience

Symplectic ID: 
2084239
Source: 
Manual
This is the preferred source?: 
1
Last Synced with Symplectic: 
Saturday, 27 June, 2026 - 10:41
DOI: 
10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103129
Publication Date: 
Saturday, 1 March, 2025
First Page: 
103129
Last Page: 
103129
Keywords: 
13 Climate Action
38 Economics
3801 Applied Economics
7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Authors: 
van der ploeg, F
Authors list has been truncated: 
0
Editors list has been truncated: 
Abstract: 
Policy makers must take account of the fact that carbon taxes are highly unpopular. Once policy makers take this into account, they should adopt a modified targeting principle by setting the optimal carbon tax below the Pigouvian tax (i.e., the social cost of carbon) and excessively subsidising products that are made with renewable energy. We numerically illustrate these behavioural biases in climate policies in the face of heightened carbon tax salience and note that this helps to explain distortions in current climate policies. We find that governments might then even take the easy option of green spending and fossil fuel subsidies rather than taxing carbon emissions. This is costly as welfare is lower than it would be without behavioural misperceptions.
Publisher: 
Elsevier
ISSN: 
0095-0696
Journal Title: 
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
eISSN: 
1096-0449
Volume: 
130
ID at Source: 
F4A43F52-2ABA-4778-B23F-1D33E14CAC01
Publication Status: 
Accepted
Open access: 
Publication Date - Display month part?: 
Publication Date - Display day part?: 
SSO preference: 
econ0254